IBM 18714AG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	IBM 18714AG (all builds)
Motherboard	IBM 18714AG
Memory	0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20060213
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 17 '18 at 20:55
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium M processor 1.86GHz-$49 196 User benchmarks, average bench 28% None, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	Memory 44.5 1-Core 17.4 2-Core 16.5 21% 26.1 Pts	4-Core 15.4 8-Core 17.4 2% 16.4 Pts	64-Core 17.3 1% 17.3 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WL160GLSA854G 160GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 155 146 1233 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 334 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 352 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 307 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 28 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5127 (C2) HDA temperature 103 97 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	31.2% Below average	Read 69.6 Write 38.9 Mixed 47.6 39% 52.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.43 4K Mixed 0.3 77% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 46%
Fujitsu MHV2040AH 40GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 36GB free Firmware: 00840096 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 41 123386 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 12124160 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 2350 (05) Reallocated sector count 28 28 1237062781978 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 1913 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 11507718 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1744 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 194 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 85486 (C2) HDA temperature 100 35 236222349344 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 370 (C4) Reallocation count 28 28 30320954391 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 91 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 1 1 255 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 96 27788 (CB) Run out cancel 100 100 1529045581417	18.8% Very poor	Read 32.2 Write 33 Mixed 31.8 24% 32.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.15 4K Mixed 0.27 72% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	8.05% Terrible	MC Read 2.3 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 2.2 7% 2.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 2.1 7% 2.57 GB/s	Latency 182 22% 182 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.05% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

IBM 18714AG

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)