Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	40.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z (all builds)
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121109
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 12 '16 at 04:46
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	96.4% Outstanding	Memory 99 1-Core 133 2-Core 263 93% 165 Pts	4-Core 514 8-Core 679 76% 596 Pts	64-Core 672 42% 672 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 96.4% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410 30,815 User benchmarks, average bench 53% EVGA(3842 2888) 3GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6182 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40.9% Average	Lighting 44.7 Reflection 53.3 Parallax 114 36% 70.8 fps	MRender 42.1 Gravity 74.1 Splatting 62.8 50% 59.7 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 60GB 1,562 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 110 110 28827687 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 100639673696712 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3978 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 4624 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 51 60132884510 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 28827687 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 28827687 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 28827687 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 9778 (EA) Unknown 0 0 7937 (F1) Unknown 0 0 7937 (F2) Unknown 0 0 13639	53.5% Above average	Read 431 Write 70.4 Mixed 120 44% 207 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 75.1 4K Mixed 11.7 104% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 30.8 DQ Write 75.4 DQ Mixed 12.9 21% 39.7 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 69%
Samsung HD080HJ 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 528GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 4 (03) Spinup time 164 160 6775 (04) Start/Stop count 82 82 18880 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 52 52 35344 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 83 83 17299 (C0) Power-off retract count 191 191 7279 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 194 194 18871 (C2) HDA temperature 119 104 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 193 63 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 194 62 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 105 (C8) Write error rate 200 191 0	39.2% Below average	Read 64.7 Write 71.9 Mixed 71.4 52% 69.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.32 79% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 98%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 318GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 133 129 6333 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2073 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 20173 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1827 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 466 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 7 7 579508 (C2) HDA temperature 113 99 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 48 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	36.7% Below average	Read 58.4 Write 69.6 Mixed 62.5 48% 63.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 0.35 4K Mixed 0.16 48% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 59%
TOSHIBA MK8025GAL 80GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 50GB free, PID 2506 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13.1% Very poor	Read 27.5 Write 28.4 Mixed 26.6 36% 27.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.91 4K Mixed 0.24 41% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL7-2GBRM E30119A 04CD F3-12800CL7-2GBRM E30119A 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	78.2% Very good	MC Read 27.8 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 24.1 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 23.1 SC Write 24.2 SC Mixed 25.9 70% 24.4 GB/s	Latency 40.9 98% 40.9 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Maximus IV Extreme-Z Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 58%

Gunboat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 47%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	226x
Core i7-2700KIntel $89Bench 73%, 20,692 samples	65x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	42x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	39x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	22x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	15x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	25x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	15x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $737

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353