Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX300 S6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu PRIMERGY TX300 S6  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2619
Memory10.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101006
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '18 at 13:23
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 59.4
2-Core 123
55% 88.8 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 388
39% 315 Pts
64-Core 634
39% 634 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI RAID 5/6 SAS 6G 898GB
837GB free
Firmware: 2.40
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
281% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 494
Mixed 471
363% 482 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 1.01
4K Mixed 0.9
689% 5.2 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 281%
Great: 281%
Samsung HD253GJ 250GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 113
Write 97.6
Mixed 91.4
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.29
80% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 18 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 15.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback