Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX100 S7p

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu PRIMERGY RX100 S7p  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3034-B1
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120907
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 12 '21 at 01:29
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1270 V2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 105
2-Core 200
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 509
53% 425 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 400A) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.83% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 2.6
2% 2.83 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.83%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI RAID 5/6 SAS 6G 898GB
771GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 59 63 58 54 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 325
Write 64.5
Mixed 77.6
SusWrite 58
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 110%
Great: 281%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC72C8PG0NF-DI 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
54.5% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.5
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 17
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback