Asus P7H55-M/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7H55-M/USB3  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101029
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateMar 07 '18 at 13:47
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 760-$100
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 93.7
1-Core 84.4
2-Core 154
68% 111 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 291
39% 290 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.1% Above average
Lighting 63.1
Reflection 68.7
Parallax 65.3
51% 65.7 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 60.4
Splatting 55.4
50% 62.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.3% Below average
Read 183
Write 168
Mixed 155
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 7.38
44% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 16.9
DQ Write 32.4
DQ Mixed 7.45
10% 18.9 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
705GB free
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 143
Mixed 140
116% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.22
81% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST3500418AS 320GB
298GB free
Firmware: PC3OC71E Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 106
Write 112
Mixed 18.8
57% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.42
97% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 14
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 11.8
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H55-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback