Asrock H97M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics70.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H97M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160613
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 31 '18 at 05:35
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-4690-$255
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
SC Int 114
SC Float 113
SC Mixed 115
91% 114 Pts
QC Int 435
QC Float 428
QC Mixed 435
98% 433 Pts
MC Int 436
MC Float 426
MC Mixed 442
65% 435 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$240
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.43
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Lighting 228
Reflection 195
Parallax 229
71% 218 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 200
Splatting 152
71% 165 fps
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 77%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$67
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 493
Write 402
Mixed 418
97% 437 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 13.9
70% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 28.4
DQ Write 49.4
DQ Mixed 14.5
18% 30.8 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 124%
Crucial M4 64GB-$100
46GB free
Firmware: 000F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 470
Write 106
Mixed 176
54% 251 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 33.9
4K Mixed 4.68
52% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 87.9
DQ Mixed 4.62
32% 76.2 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$83
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 73.1
Write 100
Mixed 118
74% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.28
80% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 97%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 134
Write 113
Mixed 113
90% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 2.25
4K Mixed 0.27
104% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 83%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8
14GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 121
Write 21.6
Mixed 31.4
55% 57.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.48
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.85
101% 2.62 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.8% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 20
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 21.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 55.2
72% 55.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 63%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H97M Pro4 Builds (Compare 2,443 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock H97M Pro4 - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $756
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $365Nvidia GTX 1070 $335Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $67
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $240Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i5-8600K $250Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $125SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $830SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $140SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback