Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	5.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5335 68 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	37% Below average	Memory 57.3 1-Core 22 2-Core 46.1 29% 41.8 Pts	4-Core 91.8 8-Core 182 16% 137 Pts	64-Core 181 11% 181 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Dell(1028 1083) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 387.95 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	5.57% Terrible	Lighting 6.93 Reflection 7.08 Parallax 8.12 6% 7.38 fps	MRender 4.86 Gravity 7.27 Splatting 7.3 5% 6.48 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.57% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Marvell Raid VD 256GB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: MV.R00-0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value	48% Average	Read 362 Write 302 Mixed 333 74% 332 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 22.3 4K Mixed 7.47 43% 14.7 MB/s	DQ Read 56.9 DQ Write 54 DQ Mixed 5.39 18% 38.8 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 24GB 14,716 User benchmarks, average bench 43% null MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	16.6% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 6.1 16% 5.77 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 3 8% 2.93 GB/s	Latency 136 30% 136 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 72%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
Xeon E5405IntelBench 42%, 719 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon 3.00GHz1stBench 29%, 131 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon E53451stBench 41%, 462 samples	1x

GPU
HD 5870AMDBench 19%, 10,176 samples	1x
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples	1x
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples	1x

SSD
870 QVO 2TBSamsung $145Bench 102%, 41,734 samples	1x

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $145

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16