Asus P5K SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5K SE  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070719
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 03 '16 at 04:54
Run Duration352 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E6750
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
42.5% Average
Memory 75.3
1-Core 30.4
2-Core 58.9
39% 54.9 Pts
4-Core 60
8-Core 59.8
8% 59.9 Pts
64-Core 60.1
4% 60.1 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT
Asus(1043 8267) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
6.2% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 8.38
Parallax 2.88
7% 6.52 fps
MRender 7.24
Gravity 6.43
Splatting 5.43
5% 6.37 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.2%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 208
Write 200
Mixed 204
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 12.2
81% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 24.6
DQ Write 60.5
DQ Mixed 12.2
18% 32.5 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3250620AS 250GB-$149
0GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.96% Terrible
Read 5.24
Write 4.77
Mixed 14.9
6% 8.32 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 0.68
4K Mixed 0.26
56% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 2.96%
Great: 43%
Kingston DataTraveler 160 32GB
2GB free, PID 1646
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
5.31% Terrible
Read 17.2
Write 7.18
Mixed 9.06
12% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.03
20% 1.65 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.31%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
20% Very poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.17 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5K SE Builds (Compare 210 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback