Today's hottest deals

Intel DQ57TM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemINTEL_ DQ57TM__
MotherboardIntel DQ57TM  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '18 at 03:05
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$200
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 152
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 371
39% 314 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.1% Above average
Lighting 58.6
Reflection 74.3
Parallax 68
48% 67 fps
MRender 70.1
Gravity 68.8
Splatting 71.7
58% 70.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_M500_MTFDDAK480MAV 480GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.1% Average
Read 197
Write 230
Mixed 155
43% 194 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 12.7
67% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 22.2
DQ Write 89.2
DQ Mixed 14.7
23% 42 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 98%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
24GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 143
Write 159
Mixed 92.2
98% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.32
102% 1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU7BFR8A-PB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.6% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12.7
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 11
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DQ57TM Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel DQ57TM - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $450
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback