Asus G750JM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	29.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus G750JM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G750JM
Memory	28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140717
Uptime	7 Days
Run Date	Apr 22 '18 at 19:40
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370 42,062 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 80.3 1-Core 95.8 2-Core 191 70% 122 Pts	4-Core 326 8-Core 496 51% 411 Pts	64-Core 495 31% 495 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 157D) 2.5GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3574 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 2% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84 8,513 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1995 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 478 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 15 (AE) Unknown 100 100 540 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 50 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 121 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3254542396 (F2) Unknown 100 100 2346512344	29.6% Poor	Read 436 Write 53.3 Mixed 61.4 39% 184 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 8.96 4K Mixed 4.5 27% 8.13 MB/s	DQ Read 35.7 DQ Write 9.28 DQ Mixed 5.74 9% 16.9 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 56%
Hitachi HTS541515A9E630 1.5TB 2,360 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 886GB free Firmware: KA0OA500 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 129 129 98784247810 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 18496 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 2393 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 991 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 20 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 87 87 130636 (C2) HDA temperature 253 253 223338758167 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	32.3% Below average	Read 53.9 Write 58.5 Mixed 6.66 29% 39.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.15 60% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 59%
USB 3.0 UFD 32GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 10GB free, PID 0903 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	9.82% Terrible	Read 28.5 Write 19.7 Mixed 13.2 24% 20.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.53 4K Write 0.26 4K Mixed 0.3 28% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.82% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 32GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	55.5% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 16.2 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 19.2 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 80.1 50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G750JM Builds (Compare 473 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JM

CPU
Core i7-4700HQIntel $370Bench 62%, 42,062 samples	347x
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	99x
Core i5-4200HIntelBench 57%, 11,882 samples	26x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	297x
GTX 860MNvidiaBench 16%, 18,736 samples	175x
GTX 870MNvidiaBench 22%, 3,247 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	15x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	51x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 22,647 samples	39x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 18,159 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $500

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16