Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel D33217GKE
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130422
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '18 at 09:55
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3217U
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 75.7
1-Core 45.3
2-Core 78.1
44% 66.4 Pts
4-Core 93.1
8-Core 106
13% 99.4 Pts
64-Core 109
7% 109 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Intel(8086 2044) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.26% Terrible
Lighting 3.63
Reflection 4.65
Parallax 2.53
3% 3.61 fps
MRender 4.05
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 7.04
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.26%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 525 Series mSATA 60GB-$115
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LLLi Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 453
Write 76.2
Mixed 126
47% 218 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 10.1
60% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 21.6
DQ Write 39
DQ Mixed 8.95
13% 23.2 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 71%
ASMT 2105 240GB
61GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 30.9
Write 23
Mixed 25.3
33% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.19
4K Write 0.23
4K Mixed 0.16
14% 0.19 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 234%
1GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
7.6% Terrible
Read 28.8
Write 15.1
Mixed 16.2
23% 20 MB/s
4K Read 0.04
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.02
2% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.6%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905469-018.A00LF Samsung M471B5773DH0-CK0 4GB
1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.7% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13.4
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8.2
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,003 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback