Today's hottest deals

Asus Q87M-A/TYCO/SI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Q87M-A/TYCO/SI  (all builds)
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140821
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '20 at 04:56
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 93.9
1-Core 112
2-Core 219
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 575
62% 492 Pts
64-Core 584
36% 584 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
PNY(196E 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.5% Above average
Lighting 74.9
Reflection 79.8
Parallax 71.3
61% 75.4 fps
MRender 76.8
Gravity 69.8
Splatting 63.2
56% 69.9 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 324 217 153 136 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 487
Mixed 418
SusWrite 235
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 62.4
211% 75.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 117%
Great: 134%
Intel 525 Series mSATA 60GB-$115
46GB free
Firmware: LLLi
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 74 77 80 79 81 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 417
Write 84.1
Mixed 131
SusWrite 77.9
39% 178 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 40.9
147% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 82
DQ Mixed 102
77% 104 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 71%
Samsung PM810 2.5" 7mm 128GB
64GB free
Firmware: AXM06D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 227 236 235 222 243 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 245
Write 182
Mixed 156
SusWrite 232
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 33.6
4K Mixed 16.2
63% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 39.1
DQ Mixed 20.7
31% 59.7 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 50%
Seagate ST1000NM0011 1TB
841GB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 141 138 142 143 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 132
Write 132
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 142
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
62% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 19.1
60% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 20.3
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q87M-A/TYCO/SI Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Q87M-A/TYCO/SI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback