ADD TO PC
BUILD

Intel S2600IP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Intel S2600IP ..........
Motherboard	Intel S2600IP (all builds)
Memory	28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130226
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 23 '18 at 19:28
Run Duration	249 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2603 0 237 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	54% Above average	Memory 73 1-Core 46.8 2-Core 95.1 46% 71.6 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 371 33% 281 Pts	64-Core 370 23% 370 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% EVGA(3842 2632) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 311.6 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.14% Terrible	Lighting 5.03 Reflection 5.96 Parallax 4.31 4% 5.1 fps	MRender 7.33 Gravity 5.3 Splatting 3.57 4% 5.4 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.14% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 5 Volume 2.5TB 248GB free Firmware: 1.0. Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30 12,344 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 116GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01S02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 2 (03) Spinup time 140 139 3991 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 224 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 21119 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 138 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 104 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 119 (C2) HDA temperature 107 100 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	53.7% Above average	Read 105 Write 81.9 Mixed 27.2 52% 71.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 2.56 4K Mixed 0.41 128% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 18JSF25672PY-1G1D1 18JSF25672PY-1G1D1 18JSF25672PY-1G1D1 18JSF25672PY-1G1D1 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 Samsung M393B5170FH0-CH9 Samsu... 32GB 1333, 1333, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	64.7% Good	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 24.1 MC Mixed 24.3 74% 26 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 5 18% 6.27 GB/s	Latency 94.7 42% 94.7 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback