Asus PRIME Z370-A

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME Z370-A (all builds)
Memory	20.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180427
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 31 '18 at 04:21
Run Duration	547 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173 264,837 User benchmarks, average bench 91% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	97.7% Outstanding	Memory 96.6 1-Core 133 2-Core 267 93% 165 Pts	4-Core 532 8-Core 783 82% 657 Pts	64-Core 780 48% 780 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 97.7% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Sapphire(174B 3001) CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.2.1 Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31.5% Below average	Lighting 41 Reflection 27.3 Parallax 50.8 33% 39.7 fps	MRender 27.1 Gravity 39.9 Splatting 34.1 28% 33.7 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 365GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1598 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 215 (B1) Unknown 99 99 6 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 49 38 51 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 28 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7209634347	89% Excellent	Read 513 Write 413 Mixed 420 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 94.3 4K Mixed 27.1 134% 51.4 MB/s	DQ Read 43.7 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 27.1 34% 58.5 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 134%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42 25,948 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 105GB free Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 4832822 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 64 64 13194139565342 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 27 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 171 (B1) Unknown 0 0 6 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4832822 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4832822 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4832822 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 29739 (EA) Unknown 0 0 23437 (F1) Unknown 0 0 23437 (F2) Unknown 0 0 18066	68.7% Good	Read 509 Write 144 Mixed 211 63% 288 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 13.8 113% 48 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 37.7 63% 123 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 82%
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB 8,655 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 87GB free Firmware: CXB70H1Q Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	139% Outstanding	Read 1,034 Write 633 Mixed 697 174% 788 MB/s	4K Read 55.6 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 32.9 186% 66.9 MB/s	DQ Read 60.7 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 149 98% 113 MB/s
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 139% Great: 317%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$78 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC3C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 8 (03) Spinup time 93 85 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3432 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 61 4510886898 (09) Power-on hours count 38 11 55138 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 585 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 97 97 3 (BC) Unknown 100 97 12885098540 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 49 672858152 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 178 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 7949 (C2) HDA temperature 40 51 68719476776 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 22 6 8 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -26701811663925 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2778391250 (F2) Unknown 100 253 4149419116	72.6% Very good	Read 132 Write 119 Mixed 104 89% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 6.16 4K Mixed 0.58 207% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 75%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB 21,039 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0304 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	59.4% Above average	Read 102 Write 104 Mixed 77 70% 94.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.31 4K Write 4.21 4K Mixed 0.28 164% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 67%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB 21,039 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 863GB free Firmware: 0304 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 92.3 Write 91.9 Mixed 65.2 62% 83.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.15 4K Write 4.09 4K Mixed 0.44 172% 1.89 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 67%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB 21,039 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 217GB free Firmware: 0304 Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	38% Below average	Read 56.2 Write 75.3 Mixed 45 44% 58.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.86 4K Write 3.83 4K Mixed 0.3 140% 1.66 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 67%
ST4000LM 024-2AN17V 4TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 3.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65% Good	Read 134 Write 126 Mixed 81.1 141% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 5.82 4K Mixed 0.46 217% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 59%
WDC WD30 EZRS-00J99B0 3TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 2.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Read 97.7 Write 97.3 Mixed 63.9 108% 86.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 0.41 4K Mixed 0.2 24% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 45%
WDC WD20 EADS-00R6B0 2TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1.5TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Read 34.5 Write 36.4 Mixed 35 46% 35.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.96 4K Mixed 0.23 76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 35%
WDC WD10 EADS-00L5B1 1TB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 829GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	39% Below average	Read 95.1 Write 86.3 Mixed 84.9 113% 88.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 0.24 80% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 39%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00WN9B0 4TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 676GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 34.7 Write 30.6 Mixed 35.6 43% 33.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 23% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 47%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 661GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 36.9 Write 38.1 Mixed 37.4 49% 37.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.03 4K Mixed 0.19 43% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 59%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B0 1TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 634GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Read 83.7 Write 79.9 Mixed 61 94% 74.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 2.42 4K Mixed 0.37 97% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 37%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power DB 500GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 249GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	40.1% Average	Read 94.5 Write 97.2 Mixed 86.3 119% 92.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.19 64% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GVKB Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH F4-3200C16-8GVKB 24GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	102% Outstanding	MC Read 39.6 MC Write 39.9 MC Mixed 29.8 104% 36.4 GB/s	SC Read 21.3 SC Write 38.7 SC Mixed 29.8 86% 29.9 GB/s	Latency 51.8 77% 51.8 ns
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME Z370-A Builds (Compare 11,208 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 110%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 100%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A - $132

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	5,978x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	2,122x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	935x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	1,113x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	1,070x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	741x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	539x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	491x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	406x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	846x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	315x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	306x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $935

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16