Asus CG8565

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus CG8565  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CG8565
Memory10.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '18 at 12:51
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 96.2
1-Core 110
2-Core 222
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 568
63% 496 Pts
64-Core 568
35% 568 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Asus(1043 83AC) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 23.5
Parallax 18
16% 20.6 fps
MRender 27
Gravity 20.5
Splatting 21.6
19% 23 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata S596 Turbo 64GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 110512 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 240
Write 63.8
Mixed 95.9
29% 133 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 26.7
4K Mixed 9.09
47% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 15.7
DQ Write 23
DQ Mixed 9.63
10% 16.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 36%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
408GB free
Firmware: JC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 114
Write 102
Mixed 96.7
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.4
94% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
51GB free
Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 90.7
Write 85
Mixed 81.9
65% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.54
107% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLA302G08-MGJHB 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.8% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 18.3
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 21
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 53.1
75% 53.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CG8565 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

System: Asus CG8565

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $521
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback