QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	1.4 GB free of 7 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	8.9 Days
Run Date	Jun 12 '18 at 20:45
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 82.7 1-Core 102 2-Core 181 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 262 8-Core 292 36% 277 Pts	64-Core 280 17% 280 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 4995) CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.93 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.9% Average	Lighting 65.6 Reflection 70.1 Parallax 59.9 53% 65.2 fps	MRender 62.8 Gravity 60.9 Splatting 39.7 43% 54.5 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 2TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 717GB free Firmware: 0001 Max speed: Unknown Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.1% Below average	Read 59.7 Write 67.4 Mixed 50.3 44% 59.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.21 4K Write 7.01 4K Mixed 0.09 148% 2.44 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 78%
Red Hat VirtIO 966GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 575GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 Max speed: Unknown Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Read 95 Write 111 Mixed 72.8 69% 93.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.21 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.17 55% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 100%
Red Hat VirtIO 107GB 129 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 35GB free Firmware: 0001 Max speed: PIO DMA 16 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x7GB 828 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1 of 1 slots used 7GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 9.2 27% 9.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 8.7 25% 8.9 GB/s	Latency 75.6 53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 121%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	8x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	7x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	5x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	22x
2x16GBQEMUBench 108%, 1,370 samples	12x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16