Lenovo 20354

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20354  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 5A5
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '18 at 20:37
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 99%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 3558U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
48.9% Average
Memory 87.1
1-Core 39.9
2-Core 74.8
47% 67.3 Pts
4-Core 64.7
8-Core 80
9% 72.3 Pts
64-Core 76.8
5% 76.8 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 380D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3368
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.13% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 6.85
Parallax 2.91
2% 4.08 fps
MRender 3.71
Gravity 1.03
Splatting 3.52
2% 2.76 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.13%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 456
Write 249
Mixed 247
70% 317 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 8.86
42% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 77.8
DQ Write 39.2
DQ Mixed 20.5
25% 45.8 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 88%
Jmicron Generic 200GB
84GB free
Firmware: 0114
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28% Poor
Read 49
Write 48.7
Mixed 47.8
36% 48.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 0.41
4K Mixed 0.25
56% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28%
Great: 28%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
23GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
8.46% Terrible
Read 25.5
Write 11.6
Mixed 13
19% 16.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.43
4K Write 0.39
4K Mixed 0.55
48% 1.79 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.46%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
RAMAXEL RMT3170ME68F9F1600 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
27.8% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8.9
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20354 Builds (Compare 2,099 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20354

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback