Fujitsu AMILO Pi 3660

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu AMILO Pi 3660  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU EF9A
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 945 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100201
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJun 27 '18 at 08:52
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T6600
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Memory 47
1-Core 25.8
2-Core 35.1
26% 36 Pts
4-Core 56
8-Core 60.6
8% 58.3 Pts
64-Core 49.2
3% 49.2 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240M
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 118E) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
2.7% Terrible
Lighting 3.33
Reflection 4.73
Parallax 1.28
3% 3.12 fps
MRender 4.62
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 3.13
3% 3.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.7%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 142 131 133 133 157 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44% Average
Read 163
Write 131
Mixed 199
SusWrite 147
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 16.5
77% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 108
85% 118 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 44%
Great: 108%
Wintec ExpressCard 96GB
53GB free
Firmware: 090928B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 70 68 69 66 69 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.1% Average
Read 83.6
Write 49.6
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 68.2
46% 62.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2
502% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 4
12% 4.03 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 4.1
10% 3.4 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AMILO Pi 3660 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu AMILO Pi 3660

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback