HP EliteBook 2560p

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP EliteBook 2560p (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 162B
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130718
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 19 '15 at 21:00
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2540M-$315 16,964 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Memory 80.4 1-Core 68.6 2-Core 120 56% 89.6 Pts	4-Core 175 8-Core 174 23% 175 Pts	64-Core 175 11% 175 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 162B) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2559 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	2.12% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 4.04 Parallax 1.62 2% 2.65 fps	MRender 3.19 Gravity 1.33 Splatting 4.52 3% 3.02 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.12% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PA128HMCD-010 128GB 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: AXM0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 199 199 21679 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11033 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2186 (AA) Unknown 76 76 1538 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 95 95 165 (AE) Unknown 99 99 80 (B7) Unknown 100 100 12604 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 99 99 41 (BE) vendor-specific 77 77 23 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 201 201 0	26.4% Poor	Read 74 Write 170 Mixed 111 27% 118 MB/s	4K Read 9.25 4K Write 28.8 4K Mixed 5.97 37% 14.7 MB/s	DQ Read 70.4 DQ Write 34.7 DQ Mixed 11.9 20% 39 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 51%
Wintec ExpressCard 96GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 54GB free Firmware: 9090 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.5% Above average	Read 110 Write 66.6 Mixed 72.1 62% 83 MB/s	4K Read 7.89 4K Write 2.01 4K Mixed 1.47 529% 3.79 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 52%
Toshiba MK2552GSX 250GB-$49 2,386 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 51GB free Firmware: LV01 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1604 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 12960 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 61 61 15639 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3398 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 3 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3473449 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 90 90 104043 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 300648300572 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 8309 (DE) Loaded hours 98 98 1064 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 346 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	19.3% Very poor	Read 36.2 Write 31 Mixed 33.9 25% 33.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 0.89 4K Mixed 0.25 59% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.1% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 15.7 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 14 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 79.9 50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 2560p Builds (Compare 367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 2560p

CPU
Core i5-2520MIntel $34Bench 48%, 45,308 samples	118x
Core i7-2620MIntelBench 52%, 16,111 samples	97x
Core i5-2540MIntel $315Bench 52%, 16,964 samples	92x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	340x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	21x
HD Graphics 4000IntelBench 2%, 106 samples	3x

SSD
320 Series 160GBIntel $149Bench 42%, 13,029 samples	10x
C400 RealSSD 128GBMicronBench 56%, 11,312 samples	9x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	125x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	72x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	47x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $183

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363