Asrock Z270 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 100% UFO	Workstation 80% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock Z270 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	52.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161103
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 28 '18 at 02:49
Run Duration	307 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Memory 89.7 1-Core 147 2-Core 292 96% 176 Pts	4-Core 528 8-Core 726 79% 627 Pts	64-Core 583 36% 583 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% MSI(1462 C303) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Lighting 132 Reflection 143 Parallax 134 108% 136 fps	MRender 99.5 Gravity 127 Splatting 109 91% 112 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 717 411 379 339 383 364 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	238% Outstanding	Read 2,053 Write 1,518 Mixed 573 SusWrite 432 253% 1,144 MB/s	4K Read 46.4 4K Write 184 4K Mixed 66.7 253% 99.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,114 DQ Write 1,208 DQ Mixed 959 778% 1,094 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 238% Great: 254%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 393GB free Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1932 2006 2012 2016 2005 2005 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	357% Outstanding	Read 2,293 Write 1,903 Mixed 948 SusWrite 1,996 400% 1,785 MB/s	4K Read 54.2 4K Write 182 4K Mixed 74.7 274% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 1,304 DQ Write 1,345 DQ Mixed 1,133 905% 1,261 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 357% Great: 353%
Kingston SUV400S 480GB 157 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 437GB free Firmware: 0C3J SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 263 247 126 97 112 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Read 361 Write 368 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 201 53% 240 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 50.6 4K Mixed 36 109% 36.7 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 148 129% 191 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 83%
WD Purple Surveillance 6TB (2017)-$100 1,747 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 165 163 163 163 166 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	79.1% Very good	Read 112 Write 109 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 163 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 99%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$179 904 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 3TB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 179 180 181 181 183 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 452GB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 168 169 169 165 170 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Read 142 Write 129 Mixed 30.3 SusWrite 166 84% 117 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 1 247% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 87%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 250GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 137GB free, PID a006 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 40 40 39 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Read 38 Write 36.5 Mixed 26 SusWrite 39.4 47% 35 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 166%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMU32GX4M2C3000C15 029E CMU32GX4M2C3000C15 64GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	68.3% Good	MC Read 25.1 MC Write 26 MC Mixed 20.9 69% 24 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 26 SC Mixed 24 59% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 67.7 59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z270 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 1,186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Extreme4 - $170

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	630x
Core i5-7600KIntel $169Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	174x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	92x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	126x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	126x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	69x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	38x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	38x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	60x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	51x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $734

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16