TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3.95GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3.95GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory1.9 GB free of 3.95313 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170602
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 10 '18 at 07:16
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 200
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 397
45% 350 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 68%
 Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 123GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 138 133 147 158 141 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.3% Below average
Read 46.2
Write 190
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 146
24% 102 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 15.2
68% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 63
DQ Mixed 94.3
81% 123 MB/s
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$100
141GB free
Firmware: 82.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 113 117 115 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 136
Write 117
Mixed 90.7
SusWrite 114
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
184% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 71.8%
 Great: 100%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 3004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 183 183 183 183 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 194
Mixed 122
SusWrite 182
125% 170 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.1
290% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑
This bench: 104%
 Great: 104%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$100
267GB free
Firmware: 82.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 128 129 129 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 136
Write 113
Mixed 86.1
SusWrite 129
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 76%
 Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
3968, 80 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.3% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 13
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 12.4
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 8% ↑
This bench: 38.3%
 Great: 23%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples2,045x
Core i7-2600Intel  $136Bench 67%, 185,630 samples1,580x
Core i5-3470Intel  $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples941x
GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples1,056x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples826x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples457x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples431x
RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples519x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples379x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples298x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback