| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 23% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS W480 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D2917-A1 |
| Memory | 5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110406 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 22 '18 at 10:23 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 54% |
PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5 670
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
44.2%
Average
|
55% 93.6 Pts
|
21% 162 Pts
|
11% 178 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Elitegroup(1019 1028) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.62
|
17.7%
Very poor
|
18% 20.2 fps
|
16% 20.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba THNS128GG4BBAA 128GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGBA0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 71 55 57 61 52 MB/s
|
23%
Poor
|
23% 101 MB/s
|
43% 14.7 MB/s
|
14% 19.7 MB/s
|
|
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
298GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 103 103 104 103 103 MB/s
|
58.9%
Above average
|
66% 89.8 MB/s
|
177% 1.23 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown M391B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
26.8%
Poor
|
27% 9.37 GB/s
|
19% 6.67 GB/s
|
33% 120 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS W480 Builds (Compare 20 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W480
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon X3470IntelBench 69%, 8,730 samples | 10x |
| Xeon X3450IntelBench 66%, 3,425 samples | 6x |
| Xeon X3480IntelBench 72%, 524 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| FirePro V5800 (FireGL V)ATIBench 9%, 444 samples | 3x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 3x |
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |