Asus Z9PA-D8 Series

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	61.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Asus Z9PA-D8 Series (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z9PA-D8 Series
Memory	26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150611
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 17 '18 at 14:20
Run Duration	231 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4,306 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Memory 56.9 1-Core 86.2 2-Core 172 58% 105 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 628 58% 482 Pts	64-Core 1,607 100% 1,607 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Lighting 76.6 Reflection 77.6 Parallax 67.4 62% 73.9 fps	MRender 71.5 Gravity 70.6 Splatting 73.4 59% 71.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 126 103 107 105 102 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Read 358 Write 345 Mixed 308 SusWrite 133 64% 286 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 53.5 4K Mixed 38.6 124% 41 MB/s	DQ Read 262 DQ Write 252 DQ Mixed 256 192% 257 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 115%
LSI MegaSR 254GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 236GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 103 101 99 107 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 27% Great: 40%
LSI MegaSR 3TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 880GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 42 42 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Read 120 Write 9.7 Mixed 20.2 SusWrite 41.2 35% 47.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 85%
LSI MegaSR 8TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2.5TB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 20 19 19 20 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.2% Below average	Read 89.4 Write 7 Mixed 16.8 SusWrite 19.3 24% 33.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 51% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 99%
LSI MegaSR 10TB 2TB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 43 42 41 43 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	57% Above average	Read 157 Write 24.5 Mixed 36.3 SusWrite 41.9 47% 64.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 143% 0.87 MB/s

Wl600gls A3210000 600GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 325GB free Firmware: 04.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 126 124 126 127 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	73.7% Very good	Read 130 Write 127 Mixed 88.6 SusWrite 126 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1.3 254% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 74%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 3TB free, PID 3322 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 106 106 107 107 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Read 102 Write 103 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 107 110% 83.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 7.5 4K Mixed 0.7 284% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 76%
Seagate Backup+ Hub WH 8TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2.5TB free, PID ab39 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 129 130 127 126 128 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Read 92.9 Write 95.2 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 129 114% 84.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 7.6 4K Mixed 0.7 286% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 73%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 1,841 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 4.5TB free, PID ab38 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 163 166 164 164 166 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Read 47.9 Write 121 Mixed 55.3 SusWrite 164 145% 97.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.6 198% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5170FH0-YH 8x4GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	85.5% Excellent	MC Read 38.3 MC Write 35.4 MC Mixed 31.7 100% 35.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 7.5 25% 8.8 GB/s	Latency 137 29% 137 ns
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z9PA-D8 Series Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 54%

Yacht

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

System: Asus Z9PA-D8 Series

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	18x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v21stBench 74%, 880 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 66%, 741 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	8x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	6x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	5x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x
P3-256 256GBBench 69%, 2,367 samples	3x

RAM
M393B1G70BH0-CK 4x8GBSamsungBench 59%, 8 samples	3x
M393B1K70CH0-CH 4x8GBSamsungBench 51%, 15 samples	3x
M393B2G70DB0-YK 2x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 4 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $227

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16