Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	76% Very good	Memory 88.2 1-Core 94.8 2-Core 189 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 370 50% 370 Pts	64-Core 375 23% 375 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Dell(1028 0577) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.82% Terrible	Lighting 1.87 Reflection 1.88 Parallax 1.44 2% 1.73 fps	MRender 3.81 Gravity 1.17 Splatting 3.65 2% 2.88 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.82% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 120GB 3,514 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 459 Write 431 Mixed 383 95% 425 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 59.1 4K Mixed 43.2 138% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 357 DQ Write 354 DQ Mixed 359 269% 357 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 115%
BUFFALO External HDD 2TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 175GB free, PID 0228 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Read 39.6 Write 37.9 Mixed 32.9 SusWrite 41.6 52% 38 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston RBU1600D3U1ELD/4GE KVT8FP-HYC 8GB 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	58.4% Above average	MC Read 22 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 17.8 58% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 17.1 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	2,190x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	984x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	933x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	226x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	158x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 56%, 6,584 samples	152x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16