Asus B75M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus B75M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140707
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '20 at 02:44
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 191
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 485
52% 413 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Zotac(19DA 2263) 2GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.05% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 9.46
Parallax 11.9
8% 10.5 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 13.2
11% 13 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.05%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN9240GESG 240GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 164 137 167 166 164 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59% Above average
Read 252
Write 242
Mixed 231
SusWrite 164
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 28.3
96% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 150
128% 186 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
55GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 50 51 51 51 51 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 67.7
Write 68.5
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 50.7
43% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 47%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 320GB-$54
56GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 84 84 84 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 69
Write 72.5
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 84.1
49% 67 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 50%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB
643GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 36.7
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 39.1
49% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 67%
BUFFALO External HDD 2TB
75GB free, PID 0228
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
9.76% Terrible
Read 21
Write 6.8
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 27
21% 16.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.5
27% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.76%
Great: 20%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
380GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 28 26 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 32
Write 26
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 27.4
35% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
38% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2X4G64CB8HG9N-DG 830B NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 830B M2X4G64CB8HG9N-DG 0443 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.8
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75M-PLUS Builds (Compare 741 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B75M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $335
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback