HP 500-365n1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP 500-365n1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2B17
Memory	18.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150310
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 02 '19 at 16:32
Run Duration	295 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-670K (2013 D.Ri) 403 User benchmarks, average bench 53% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	41.2% Average	Memory 68.7 1-Core 30.4 2-Core 51.2 36% 50.1 Pts	4-Core 81.3 8-Core 87.2 11% 84.2 Pts	64-Core 86.6 5% 86.6 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1B0A 90D3) 2GB CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	6.76% Terrible	Lighting 8.4 Reflection 9.23 Parallax 11.5 7% 9.71 fps	MRender 8.05 Gravity 7.57 Splatting 8.43 7% 8.02 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.76% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 503 499 297 293 295 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 115 122 118 115 123 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Read 127 Write 121 Mixed 65 SusWrite 116 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 83%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 569GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 140 153 145 142 155 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Read 159 Write 133 Mixed 95 SusWrite 143 98% 133 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 109%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1.5TB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 74 78 76 76 79 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 95.3 Write 101 Mixed 52 SusWrite 75 107% 80.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 44%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB 8,402 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2.5TB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 90 98 94 93 100 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 126 Write 108 Mixed 64.3 SusWrite 92.5 127% 97.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.5 201% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 61%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 866GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 104 104 94 88 87 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	43.4% Average	Read 110 Write 107 Mixed 47.8 SusWrite 94.3 118% 89.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 43%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 898GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 12 5.9 11 6.8 3 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	25.2% Poor	Read 110 Write 110 Mixed 73 SusWrite 11.5 97% 76.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 61%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00GXCB0 3TB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 5.9 2 5.3 3.5 1 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Read 148 Write 160 Mixed 84 SusWrite 5 125% 99.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 125% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 66%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB 154 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 3TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 95 103 94 99 70 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 170 Write 168 Mixed 82.3 SusWrite 90 165% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 133% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 Kingston 99U5471-066.A00LF Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 24GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.4% Poor	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 9.9 28% 9.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 8.4 19% 6.73 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP 500-365n1

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)