Acer Aspire TC-705

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-705  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-705
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '19 at 22:13
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 111
2-Core 202
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 571
56% 457 Pts
64-Core 573
36% 573 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
Sapphire(174B 249A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Lighting 13.5
Reflection 13
Parallax 9.97
11% 12.2 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 14.3
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$74
648GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 365 371 369 349 353 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 424
Mixed 385
SusWrite 367
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 44.7
148% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 270
208% 284 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 101%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
424GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 121 121 120 120 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 117
Write 96.8
Mixed 66
SusWrite 119
73% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 114%
WDC WD20 EZRX-22D8PB0 2TB
564GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 37 37 36 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.8% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 34
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 36.2
46% 34 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
108% 1.3 MB/s
ST3000DM 008-2DM166 3TB
441GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 169
Write 135
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 0.9
117% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 74%
WDC WD10 EADS-00M2B0 1TB
93GB free, PID 1018
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 40 40 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.5% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 37.2
Mixed 30
SusWrite 39.2
49% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 20%
ST500DM0 02-1BD142 500GB
24GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 38
Write 38
Mixed 28
SusWrite 39
48% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 18%
WDC WD50 01AALS-00L3B2 500GB
3GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 48 47 46 47 65 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.2% Poor
Read 47.7
Write 47.5
Mixed 41
SusWrite 54.3
65% 47.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 35%
ST3000DM 008-2DM166 3TB
349GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 49 48 47 48 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 201
Write 160
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 55.5
156% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 74%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
95GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 1.1 1 1.1 1.3 1.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 62
Write 59
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 1.6
49% 39.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.1% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.7
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-705 Builds (Compare 551 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-705

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $178
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback