Asrock FM2A58M-HD+ R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A58M-HD+ R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '19 at 04:10
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Memory 71.7
1-Core 60.2
2-Core 104
49% 78.8 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 177
24% 176 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 1380) 2GB
CLim: 1476 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Lighting 25
Reflection 19.3
Parallax 23
20% 22.5 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 26.1
Splatting 19.1
20% 24.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 79 73 75 80 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 157
Write 104
Mixed 139
SusWrite 76.8
27% 119 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 18.1
61% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 57.5
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 80.3
64% 85.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
675GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 131 158 153 164 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 147
Write 105
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 148
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 112%
Jmicron Tech 240GB
110GB free
Firmware: 0407
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 31 35 33 35 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 36
Write 33.9
Mixed 33.9
SusWrite 33
25% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 4.5
847% 5.33 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL9.9-9 D3-1600 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.4% Below average
MC Read 17
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 16.5
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.9
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A58M-HD+ R2.0 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A58M-HD+ R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $38
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback