Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics88.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII HERO  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151028
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateDec 17 '16 at 19:38
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 139
2-Core 277
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 714
71% 578 Pts
64-Core 710
44% 710 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 1996) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1631 MHz, MLim: 1742 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 376.19
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 126
Parallax 123
92% 120 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 106
Splatting 99.7
84% 102 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
855GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 405
Mixed 416
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 54.4
202% 70.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 135
156% 269 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 121%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
119GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 404
Mixed 420
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 54.2
199% 69.6 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 118
147% 263 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 121%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 528
Write 238
Mixed 324
80% 364 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 38.9
162% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 134
143% 242 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 130%
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 1TB
415GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.4% Above average
Read 112
Write 84.2
Mixed 88.1
71% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.34
106% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 56%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
129GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 91.2
Write 60.1
Mixed 84.5
60% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.39
108% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 69%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
101GB free
Firmware: 1AA01112 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 47.1
Write 51.1
Mixed 45.7
36% 47.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.46
103% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 2400 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.9% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 16.4
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 19.8
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII HERO Builds (Compare 3,767 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $642
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback