Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.71% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	19.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Dell Precision WorkStation T7500 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0D881F
Memory	30.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20181015
Uptime	6.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '20 at 01:44
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675 4,275 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 93.1 1-Core 85.1 2-Core 168 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 317 8-Core 621 56% 469 Pts	64-Core 1,143 71% 1,143 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 5800 793 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Nvidia(10DE 0593) ≥ 4GB Ram: 4GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	8.71% Terrible	Lighting 11.9 Reflection 9.19 Parallax 5.41 10% 8.82 fps	MRender 9.14 Gravity 9.63 Splatting 6.87 7% 8.55 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.71% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 105 71 38 38 42 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.2% Very poor	Read 195 Write 78.8 Mixed 110 SusWrite 65.3 25% 112 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 3.2 26% 6.33 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$75 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 198GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 134 140 151 164 148 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58.1% Above average	Read 244 Write 221 Mixed 222 SusWrite 145 47% 208 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 31.1 101% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 171 130% 174 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 129%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 207GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 32 32 33 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 101 Write 31.2 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 32 36% 48.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 100%
WD Purple Surveillance 6TB (2017)-$140 1,747 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 824GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 98 99 99 100 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Read 153 Write 155 Mixed 83.8 SusWrite 99.3 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 99%
Hitachi HUS154545VLS300 450GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 229GB free Firmware: D590 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 53 57 56 57 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	47.1% Average	Read 108 Write 56.9 Mixed 65.3 SusWrite 56 53% 71.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.2 210% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 84%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$73 8,846 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 230GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 126 128 130 134 133 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	81% Excellent	Read 153 Write 151 Mixed 74 SusWrite 129 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 113%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 62GB free Firmware: AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 92 107 103 59 105 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Read 102 Write 101 Mixed 37.3 SusWrite 95.1 61% 83.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 66% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12x4GB 970 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 12 of 12 slots used 48GB DIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49% Average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 17.2 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 5.5 16% 5.63 GB/s	Latency 62 64% 62 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision WorkStation T7500 Builds (Compare 1,108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Raft

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56901stBench 72%, 2,873 samples	163x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	88x
Xeon X5690IntelBench 75%, 4,873 samples	74x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	61x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	54x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	51x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	35x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	19x
M4 64GBCrucial $92Bench 55%, 7,336 samples	19x

RAM
6x8GBUnknownBench 53%, 2,890 samples	126x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	126x
12x4GBUnknownBench 52%, 970 samples	108x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16