Asrock H110M-HDV R3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H110M-HDV R3.0  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180117
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '20 at 19:27
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$45
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
43.8% Average
Memory 58.1
1-Core 59.8
2-Core 170
52% 95.8 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 195
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Palit(1569 1380) 2GB
CLim: 1359 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 23.1
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 20.9
19% 20.6 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 23.4
Splatting 17.8
18% 22.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 50 44 66 42 64 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.1% Below average
Read 238
Write 176
Mixed 128
SusWrite 61.6
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 8.2
38% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 0.2
59% 141 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
188GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 70 78 79 78 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 61.5
Write 64.5
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 77.3
46% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 69%
Wilk 64GB
56GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 161
Write 42.7
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 17
58% 60 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
33% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 29%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.9% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 17.3
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 20.5
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 849 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDV R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $182
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback