Asus P8H61-M

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H61-M (all builds)
Memory	6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130918
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 07 '17 at 14:37
Run Duration	95 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	Memory 94.1 1-Core 111 2-Core 207 80% 137 Pts	4-Core 341 8-Core 535 54% 438 Pts	64-Core 536 33% 536 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Gigabyte(1458 3544) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.33 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.8% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 5.73 Parallax 3.97 4% 4.77 fps	MRender 6.43 Gravity 4.9 Splatting 3.52 4% 4.95 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.8% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85 5,005 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM11.1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 553 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 358 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 200 200 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 143 (C2) HDA temperature 71 56 188979413021	30% Below average	Read 210 Write 117 Mixed 88.4 30% 139 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 21.4 4K Mixed 4.43 47% 15.2 MB/s	DQ Read 21.2 DQ Write 38.7 DQ Mixed 5.83 11% 21.9 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 99U5471-020.A00LF 8GB 577 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.6 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 17.7 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 59.5 67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61-M Builds (Compare 257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M - $77

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	34x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	32x
Core i7-2600Intel $190Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	25x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	34x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	22x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	10x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	8x

RAM
99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 53%, 9,823 samples	5x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 20,728 samples	4x
99U5471-020.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 6,486 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $354

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16