| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20160531 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 26 '18 at 14:55 |
| Run Duration | 115 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 21% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.3%
Good
|
54% 85 Pts
|
36% 292 Pts
|
22% 348 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.1.1
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
33.1%
Below average
|
26% 57.5 fps
|
46% 56.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
43%
Average
|
50% 224 MB/s
|
62% 23.9 MB/s
|
18% 32.6 MB/s
|
|
|
59.9%
Above average
|
59% 80.4 MB/s
|
103% 0.71 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 99U5471-020.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
27.4%
Poor
|
25% 8.67 GB/s
|
24% 8.5 GB/s
|
51% 78 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 463 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 155x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 110x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 65x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 43x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 24x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 23x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $517 |