Gigabyte GA-970-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160406
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 13 '20 at 20:11
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 82.2
1-Core 68.8
2-Core 130
58% 93.6 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 343
33% 273 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.8% Above average
Lighting 65.9
Reflection 66.8
Parallax 57.6
54% 63.4 fps
MRender 64.4
Gravity 62
Splatting 61
51% 62.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
842GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 251 309 330 306 333 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 428
Write 396
Mixed 360
SusWrite 292
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 56.2
4K Mixed 33.6
112% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 165
136% 197 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 121%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
110GB free
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 109 127 126 119 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 338
Write 139
Mixed 181
SusWrite 122
43% 195 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 25.5
89% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 147
115% 159 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$34
304GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 92 92 93 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 148
Write 152
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 91.6
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 112%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
3TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 165 175 170 172 172 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 160
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 171
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 96%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
301GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 87 91 90 90 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 84
Write 44.5
Mixed 52
SusWrite 89.6
50% 67.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.9% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 14
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 10.9
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970-GAMING Builds (Compare 330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback