Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics98.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '20 at 17:59
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 88.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 204
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 587
62% 494 Pts
64-Core 786
49% 786 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 137
Parallax 127
104% 130 fps
MRender 97.2
Gravity 120
Splatting 104
88% 107 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,549
Write 1,806
Mixed 1,430
426% 1,928 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 67.6
223% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 624
DQ Write 380
DQ Mixed 480
364% 495 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
111GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 450 447 448 453 448 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 435
Mixed 306
SusWrite 449
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 38.8
136% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 283
231% 330 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 105%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
130GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 119 123 122 123 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 80
Write 86
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 118
58% 80 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 112%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 4004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 44.5
Write 38.7
Mixed 34
SusWrite 41
29% 39.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.2
86% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 68%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
1TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 179 179 177 179 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 108
Write 118
Mixed 89.2
SusWrite 177
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.6
281% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 94%
WD Elements 1.5TB
319GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 39 41 40 40 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
20% Very poor
Read 42.5
Write 40.2
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 40.2
50% 37.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAD 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.6% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 11.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 12.8
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 485 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $1,173
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback