Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte B365 M AORUS ELITE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 23 '20 at 00:31
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	65.6% Good	Memory 72.3 1-Core 109 2-Core 182 69% 121 Pts	4-Core 318 8-Core 495 50% 406 Pts	64-Core 622 38% 622 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 315 482 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 102F) 1GB CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 392.59 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	1.41% Terrible	Lighting 1.63 Reflection 2.08 Parallax 0.47 1% 1.39 fps	MRender 2.38 Gravity 1.63 Splatting 1.83 2% 1.95 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.41% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 422GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 771 787 734 595 608 614 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	234% Outstanding	Read 2,418 Write 2,048 Mixed 1512 SusWrite 685 371% 1,666 MB/s	4K Read 49.8 4K Write 80.9 4K Mixed 58.7 194% 63.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,027 DQ Write 545 DQ Mixed 740 562% 771 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 234% Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC29 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 155 151 154 154 157 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Read 142 Write 121 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 153 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 114%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 4GB 175 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID c82a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 5.5 5.5 5.7 5.9 5.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	2.58% Terrible	Read 9.5 Write 5.2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 5.4 8% 6.07 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.58% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x16GB 5,345 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	38% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 11.9 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 11.8 33% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 96.1 42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 2,209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	731x
Core i7-9700Intel $250Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	166x
Core i5-9600KIntel $145Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	163x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	185x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	164x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	125x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	50x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	50x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	42x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	200x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	63x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $523

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16