Asus Z97-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-E  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151207
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateMay 02 '20 at 16:26
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 212
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 482
51% 409 Pts
64-Core 554
34% 554 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1575 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Lighting 48.9
Reflection 35.3
Parallax 65.3
40% 49.8 fps
MRender 33.5
Gravity 45.7
Splatting 43.7
34% 41 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 155 152 142 151 149 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 434
Write 358
Mixed 354
SusWrite 179
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 48.5
162% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 356
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 124%
MB4000GDUPB 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: HPG4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 110 108 113 115 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 128
Write 140
Mixed 52
SusWrite 110
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
865GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 139 132 134 136 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 214
Write 170
Mixed 116
SusWrite 135
117% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 100%
Great: 109%
WL6000GSA6472E 6TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01RA2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 72 75 73 76 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 78.5
Write 108
Mixed 66
SusWrite 75.9
61% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 94%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$60
1TB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 121 119 122 123 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 166
Write 137
Mixed 69
SusWrite 121
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 96%
Kingston SNA-DC/U 1TB
818GB free, PID 6298
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 38 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 37.5
Write 31.5
Mixed 32
SusWrite 39
47% 35 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMY16GX3M2A1866C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMY16GX3M2A1866C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
43% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 13.4
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.7
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-E Builds (Compare 693 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback