PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 77% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7798 |
Motherboard | MSI B75MA-P45 (MS-7798) (all builds) |
Memory | 6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit farger |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130930 |
Uptime | 3.8 Days |
Run Date | May 21 '20 at 13:52 |
Run Duration | 407 Seconds |
Run User | NOR-User |
Background CPU | 29% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
70.7%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$50
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 156 155 149 140 159 MB/s
|
77%
Very good
|
|||
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB
8.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
|
||||
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 61 69 78 74 75 MB/s
|
46.2%
Average
|
|||
Toshiba MQ01ABD050V -63 500GB
395GB free
Firmware: AX0A1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 7.3 7.3 9.2 9.5 9.9 MB/s
|
26.5%
Poor
|
|||
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
138GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 82 85 85 85 86 MB/s
|
41.1%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 23 24 22 22 23 MB/s
|
31.2%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 113 135 161 158 153 MB/s
|
67.6%
Good
|
|||
Covecube Virtual Disk 110TB
96TB free
Firmware: 0001
|
||||
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB
10GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 24 25 29 36 38 MB/s
|
19.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$60
1TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 74 80 92 92 89 MB/s
|
71.7%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$84
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 129 153 180 178 173 MB/s
|
104%
Outstanding
|
|||
Covecube Virtual Disk 4.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
|
||||
Generic External 500GB
2GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 19 26 26 MB/s
|
13.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Generic External 320GB
3GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
||||
Generic External 250GB
1GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
||||
Generic External 320GB
1GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
||||
Generic External 40GB
4GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 19 19 19 MB/s
|
11.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
45%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 311x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 229x |
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 100x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 107x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 91x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 59x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $624 |