MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7A63
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63)  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '20 at 18:22
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 95.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 255
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 731
71% 582 Pts
64-Core 685
42% 685 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.2% Above average
Lighting 69.4
Reflection 69.3
Parallax 59.8
57% 66.2 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 64.4
Splatting 62.9
52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
839GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 393 429 419 449 424 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 490
Write 436
Mixed 389
SusWrite 420
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 29.2
112% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 94.4
DQ Mixed 176
144% 215 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 121%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
618GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 397 431 420 450 424 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 442
Mixed 390
SusWrite 422
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 36.1
121% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 87.1
DQ Mixed 169
141% 212 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
922GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 193 202 193 203 192 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 168
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 196
119% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 114%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
286GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 92 97 93 100 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 103
Write 100
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 95.5
67% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57%
Great: 58%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
2GB free, PID 6990
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
4.27% Terrible
Read 16.5
Write 3.8
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 4.6
7% 6.85 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.27%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 27
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 12.2
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 54.5
73% 54.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63) Builds (Compare 5,564 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $737
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback