Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 59% Gunboat	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 75% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	63.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	20.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200701
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 03 '20 at 08:05
Run Duration	299 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495 50,170 User benchmarks, average bench 89% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Memory 65.3 1-Core 150 2-Core 298 90% 171 Pts	4-Core 582 8-Core 1,093 100% 837 Pts	64-Core 2,785 172% 2,785 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85AA) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.55 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	63.1% Good	Lighting 75.7 Reflection 84.4 Parallax 70.5 62% 76.9 fps	MRender 75.7 Gravity 86 Splatting 79.8 66% 80.5 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 260GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1363 1222 769 790 781 784 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	279% Outstanding	Read 2,286 Write 1650 Mixed 1,470 SusWrite 952 354% 1,589 MB/s	4K Read 46.3 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 75.7 228% 79.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,360 DQ Write 1,205 DQ Mixed 1,271 956% 1,278 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 279% Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2364 Write 1,917 Mixed 1,578 434% 1,953 MB/s	4K Read 55.2 4K Write 143 4K Mixed 78.5 260% 92.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,269 DQ Write 1,084 DQ Mixed 1,180 883% 1,178 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 19GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 484 Write 373 Mixed 376 91% 411 MB/s	4K Read 37.1 4K Write 71.4 4K Mixed 47.9 155% 52.1 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 200 150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$79 26,606 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 748GB free Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 77.5 Write 138 Mixed 67.9 70% 94.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 88% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$84 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2.5TB free Firmware: CC26 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 202 Write 160 Mixed 84.9 110% 149 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 114%
WDC WD15 EADS-00S2B0 1.5TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 101 103 102 101 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.1% Average	Read 93.7 Write 92.1 Mixed 65.6 SusWrite 101 120% 88.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.8 122% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 44%
WDC WD50 00AAKX-003CA0 500GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 303GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 98 101 103 102 100 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.6% Average	Read 145 Write 138 Mixed 82.1 SusWrite 101 153% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 50%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB 199 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4 3.9 2.9 2.3 5.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Read 102 Write 129 Mixed 94.7 SusWrite 3.9 108% 82.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.3 46% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113 87,239 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	62.6% Good	MC Read 23.8 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 22.7 66% 23 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 20 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 120%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $250Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,920x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,342x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	1,107x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1,105x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	880x
RTX 3090Nvidia $785Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	612x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	847x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	708x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	421x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	434x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	187x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $82Bench 95%, 56,114 samples	156x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,727

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16