PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H97M Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150518 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 08 '20 at 20:00 |
Run Duration | 164 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 27% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4690K-$55
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
49.3%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 3080-$899
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
134%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 269 283 259 292 278 MB/s
|
110%
Outstanding
|
|||
Cx2-8b256-q11 NVMe LITEON 256GB
98GB free
Firmware: 48811QD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 606 654 686 687 693 MB/s
|
176%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
677GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 176 173 179 181 176 MB/s
|
101%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
778GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 77 78 77 78 MB/s
|
41.1%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 1302 PSD34G16002 1302 1600 CL9 Series 1302 PSD34G16002 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
56%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 180x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 157x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 155x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 113x |
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 77x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 66x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $649 |