Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	63.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	86.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130715
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Oct 10 '20 at 18:46
Run Duration	468 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8370E-$471 5,639 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Memory 88 1-Core 73.4 2-Core 117 59% 92.8 Pts	4-Core 217 8-Core 366 36% 291 Pts	64-Core 367 23% 367 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6163) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Lighting 79.6 Reflection 81.5 Parallax 71 65% 77.4 fps	MRender 72.6 Gravity 73.4 Splatting 76.8 61% 74.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 302GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 225 228 200 207 202 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Read 423 Write 394 Mixed 357 SusWrite 214 78% 347 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 87.5 4K Mixed 43.8 155% 55.2 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 247 DQ Mixed 207 152% 195 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 134%
Crucial_ CT1050MX30 1TB 488 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 457GB free Firmware: M0C SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 227 247 218 221 221 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	71.3% Very good	Read 285 Write 392 Mixed 328 SusWrite 228 70% 308 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 88.5 4K Mixed 33.3 124% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 245 DQ Mixed 187 140% 181 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 103%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 143 145 135 135 137 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Read 138 Write 141 Mixed 112 SusWrite 140 98% 133 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 1.1 233% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 112%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 572GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 116 115 112 114 113 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Read 137 Write 134 Mixed 105 SusWrite 116 91% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1 210% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 112%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$194 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2TB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 123 123 119 118 117 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	79.9% Very good	Read 157 Write 137 Mixed 98.5 SusWrite 121 95% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.9 191% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 98%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100 5,498 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 67GB free Firmware: 51.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 49 49 48 45 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	Read 51 Write 52.7 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 46.6 37% 50.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 68%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 927GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 93 94 90 91 90 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Read 109 Write 108 Mixed 69.4 SusWrite 93.3 70% 94.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 76%
Sabrent Disk Dev 1TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 84GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 11 5.5 5.9 6 6 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	29.1% Poor	Read 123 Write 111 Mixed 54.4 SusWrite 8.4 90% 74 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.9 136% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 72%
Sabrent Disk Dev 1TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 931GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 35 26 26 29 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	23.5% Poor	Read 72.7 Write 80.5 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 33.7 77% 58.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 86% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 72%
WDC WD64 00BPVT-00HXZT1 640GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 292GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 30.3 Mixed 22.9 28% 26.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 19%
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 16GB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 15GB free, PID 0165 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 7.4 7.2 7.3 7 7.5 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	5.91% Terrible	Read 23.1 Write 8.5 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 7.2 13% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 19% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.91% Great: 9%
778 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 15GB free, PID 5500 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 20 19 18 18 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	8.03% Terrible	Read 19.1 Write 17.2 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 18.4 20% 15 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 22% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.03% Great: 35%
General USB Flash Disk 32GB 113 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 29GB free, PID 8381 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 12 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	9.98% Terrible	Read 40.8 Write 15.7 Mixed 8.4 SusWrite 11.8 21% 19.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 23% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.98% Great: 20%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB 4,330 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 89GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 35 37 38 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Read 202 Write 39.6 Mixed 49.6 SusWrite 36.7 84% 81.9 MB/s	4K Read 11.9 4K Write 16.7 4K Mixed 9.4 932% 12.7 MB/s	DQ Read 13.9 DQ Write 17.7 DQ Mixed 11 1,028% 14.2 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 113%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 64GB 878 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 59GB free, PID 00d2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 39 29 20 27 32 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	22.6% Poor	Read 94 Write 15.7 Mixed 28.7 SusWrite 25.5 44% 41 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.8 106% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 43%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 64GB 878 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 59GB free, PID 00d2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 6.4 31 32 20 24 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	21% Poor	Read 93 Write 15.7 Mixed 28.6 SusWrite 19.7 41% 39.2 MB/s	4K Read 8.3 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 1.8 106% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 43%
Generic- SD/MMC 64GB 132 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 60GB free, PID 0119 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 16.9 Write 16.2 Mixed 16.5 SusWrite 11.2 20% 15.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 2.8 181% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 18%
General USB Flash Disk 125GB 371 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 33GB free, PID 8381 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 0.1 7 0.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Write 38.8 SusWrite 7.3 37% 23 MB/s	4K Write 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 39%
WDC WD12 00JB-00GVA0 120GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 112GB free, PID 2506 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 26.6 Write 26 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 12.4 29% 21.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 4x4GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	48.4% Average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 17.4 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 12.4 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 69.6 58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,400 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	570x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	210x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	110x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	74x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	66x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	61x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	46x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	39x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	35x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	106x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	85x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	82x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $440

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16