Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	9.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140408
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	May 08 '17 at 02:52
Run Duration	238 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Memory 88.1 1-Core 70 2-Core 134 60% 97.3 Pts	4-Core 246 8-Core 438 41% 342 Pts	64-Core 438 27% 438 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Asus(1043 8428) 1GB CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 381.65 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	9.02% Terrible	Lighting 10 Reflection 9.08 Parallax 11.8 8% 10.3 fps	MRender 13.6 Gravity 12.2 Splatting 13.1 11% 13 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.02% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2266 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 257 (B1) Unknown 99 99 6 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 57 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 13 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4838358002
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Green 500GB (2012) 31,295 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 140GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 137 128 4116 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2451 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 12930 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2371 (C0) Power-off retract count 197 197 2542 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 128 128 217438 (C2) HDA temperature 117 100 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	59% Above average	Read 104 Write 101 Mixed 99.9 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.97 4K Write 2.42 4K Mixed 0.21 108% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 240GB free Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 96 235035408 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3183 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 31091148 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 6730 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1057 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 353 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 62 504823835 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 4 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 81 81 39996 (C2) HDA temperature 27 40 38654705691 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -44994077390566 (F1) Unknown 100 253 14820984330 (F2) Unknown 100 253 192717639490	70% Very good	Read 118 Write 126 Mixed 118 91% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.16 74% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 112%
WD Green 500GB (2012) 31,295 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 54GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 135 128 4208 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6696 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 12909 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2469 (C0) Power-off retract count 197 197 2648 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 137 137 189683 (C2) HDA temperature 117 102 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	53.6% Above average	Read 97.6 Write 88.8 Mixed 93.7 70% 93.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.91 4K Write 2.43 4K Mixed 0.19 104% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 79%
Maxtor STM3320820AS 320GB 4,234 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 47GB free Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 91 80 1537742 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10638 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 89 60 811826792 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 31099 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5723 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 1 1 22660 (BE) vendor-specific 63 47 639369253 (C2) HDA temperature 37 53 55834574885 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 51 46 128741042 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 15 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 15 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 76 229 24	25.8% Poor	Read 61.3 Write 28.5 Mixed 23.5 28% 37.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.06 4K Mixed 0.34 76% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 44%
Samsung Portable SSD T1 500GB 104 User benchmarks, average bench 170% 101GB free, PID 8002 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	Read 65.3 Write 71.7 Mixed 59.7 85% 65.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.27 64% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 329%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-666.A00G 1x8GB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 9.8 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 9.7 28% 9.87 GB/s	Latency 69.5 58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	863x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	209x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	146x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	110x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	83x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	81x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	62x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	59x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	84x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	45x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $630

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16