Asus F1A75-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics60.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus F1A75-V  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '20 at 16:17
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
42.3% Average
Memory 59
1-Core 46.4
2-Core 70.7
38% 58.7 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 189
21% 166 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.1% Good
Lighting 75
Reflection 77.5
Parallax 72.1
61% 74.9 fps
MRender 68.4
Gravity 75.6
Splatting 69.5
58% 71.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 89 100 91 74 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 125
Write 102
Mixed 114
SusWrite 86.4
24% 107 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 59.7
4K Mixed 18.5
85% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 24.1
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 24.8
30% 50.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
140GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 97 104 91 74 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 120
Write 118
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 89.5
73% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$60
111GB free
Firmware: 13.01A13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 46 45 45 46 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 49.3
Write 50.3
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 45.2
32% 43.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C11D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX2400C11D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/4G 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 12.8
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.9
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A75-V Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $81
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback