PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Alienware Aurora (all builds) |
Motherboard | Alienware 04VWF2 |
Memory | 11.2 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100406 |
Uptime | 28.7 Days |
Run Date | Jan 07 '21 at 12:04 |
Run Duration | 329 Seconds |
Run User | BEL-User |
Background CPU | 40% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
60.1%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89
|
20.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 040H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 123 91 92 100 87 MB/s
|
39.9%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
321GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 112 113 113 113 114 MB/s
|
65.8%
Good
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
530GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 137 145 145 144 149 MB/s
|
96.7%
Outstanding
|
|||
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146
1.5TB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 127 135 132 131 137 MB/s
|
76.6%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
26GB free
Firmware: 0737
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.2 4.3 4.5 4.2 4.2 MB/s
|
9.54%
Terrible
|
|||
WDC WD50 00LPVX-60V0TT0 500GB
336GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.3 4.1 4.1 MB/s
|
9.63%
Terrible
|
|||
WD My Book 1230 3TB
23GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.1 4.1 4.3 4.1 4.1 MB/s
|
11.8%
Very poor
|
|||
WD My Book 25DA 4TB
66GB free, PID 25da
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.1 4.1 4.3 4 4.8 MB/s
|
10.6%
Very poor
|
|||
TOSHIBA STOR.E ALU 2S 1TB
5GB free, PID 0b19
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.3 4.1 4.1 MB/s
|
6.14%
Terrible
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
67GB free, PID 3320
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.1 2.3 0 2.8 8.2 MB/s
|
3.97%
Terrible
|
|||
Samsung M3 Station 2TB
71GB free, PID 60f3
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.2 4.1 4.3 4.1 4.2 MB/s
|
12.5%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 107C 3TB
19GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.3 4.2 4.1 MB/s
|
11.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Samsung Flash Drive DUO 64GB
56GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 0.8 3.6 3.5 3.9 3 MB/s
|
8.75%
Terrible
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB
103GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.8 3.9 3.9 3.9 4.3 MB/s
|
11.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 14GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
|
34.5%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 219x |
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 87x |
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 51x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 36x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 34x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 32x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $249 |