Asrock X99 Extreme4/3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X99 Extreme4/3.1 (all builds)
Memory	25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150601
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '17 at 23:01
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Memory 86.3 1-Core 100 2-Core 200 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 399 8-Core 615 63% 507 Pts	64-Core 802 50% 802 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Zotac(19DA 1366) CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49% Average	Lighting 60.4 Reflection 64.9 Parallax 58.7 49% 61.3 fps	MRender 70.9 Gravity 58.4 Splatting 52.1 48% 60.5 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung Portable SSD T3 250GB 1,227 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 233GB free Firmware: 0 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 334 Write 220 Mixed 240 59% 265 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 2.18 4K Mixed 2.19 39% 9.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 75%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB 28,058 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10415 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 218 (B1) Unknown 97 97 47 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 53 35 47 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 12 (F1) Unknown 99 99 20761989041	88.3% Excellent	Read 513 Write 414 Mixed 418 100% 448 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 75 4K Mixed 26.2 124% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 37.1 DQ Write 209 DQ Mixed 21.1 46% 89 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 122%
Patriot Blaze 60GB-$62 661 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 56GB free Firmware: S9FM02.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 9989 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 222 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 16 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1310724 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 30 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 186873	49.3% Average	Read 356 Write 162 Mixed 256 57% 258 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 52.9 4K Mixed 4.59 74% 28 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 88.4 DQ Mixed 5.01 32% 73.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 62%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 108GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 169 2275 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1520 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 13141 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 287 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 30 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1497 (C2) HDA temperature 110 102 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	70.9% Very good	Read 133 Write 114 Mixed 102 87% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 2.41 4K Mixed 0.28 108% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C15 8x4GB 162 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	102% Outstanding	MC Read 38.5 MC Write 41.9 MC Mixed 38.1 113% 39.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 20.4 51% 17.8 GB/s	Latency 71.1 56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 132%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 Extreme4/3.1 Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4/3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	55x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	6x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	7x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	6x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	6x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	9x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 92%, 30,689 samples	5x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GBG.SKILL $182Bench 76%, 7,414 samples	5x
HyperX DDR4 2400 C12 4x4GBKingstonBench 86%, 1,630 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $424

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16