Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670 4,676 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	68.8% Good	Memory 78.9 1-Core 73.4 2-Core 150 60% 101 Pts	4-Core 319 8-Core 451 48% 385 Pts	64-Core 1,042 64% 1,042 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD FirePro W7100 840 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Dell(1028 230C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 920 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.Q2 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.2% Poor	Lighting 33.2 Reflection 41.7 Parallax 44.4 27% 39.8 fps	MRender 40 Gravity 33.7 Splatting 29.1 28% 34.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512 512GB 92 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 361GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1H6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 123 122 124 124 124 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39% Below average	Read 122 Write 124 Mixed 124 SusWrite 123 28% 123 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 26.8 4K Mixed 23 71% 22.5 MB/s	DQ Read 101 DQ Write 92 DQ Mixed 95.8 72% 96.2 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 111%
Toshiba DT01ACA3 2TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 1.5TB free Firmware: ABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 220 213 219 216 221 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	128% Outstanding	Read 229 Write 166 Mixed 94.1 SusWrite 217 129% 177 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.7 189% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 119%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M392B1K73CM0-YF8 ID:80 CE M392B1K73CM0-YF8 ID:80 CE M392B1K73CM0-YF8 ID:80 CE M392B1K73CM0-YF8 ID:80 CE M392B1K73CM0-YF8 ID:80 CE M392B1K73CM0-YF8 ID:80 CE M392B1K73CM0-YF8 ID:80 CE M... 98GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.4% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 8.2 25% 8.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 7.4 SC Mixed 9 25% 8.83 GB/s	Latency 82.6 48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	189x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	180x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16