Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	44.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670 4,676 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	66.6% Good	Memory 77.2 1-Core 73 2-Core 160 60% 103 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 461 47% 382 Pts	64-Core 1,042 64% 1,042 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 22,284 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 879C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.67 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44.4% Average	Lighting 55.4 Reflection 55.5 Parallax 47.7 45% 52.9 fps	MRender 61.9 Gravity 48.9 Splatting 48.9 43% 53.2 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512 512GB 92 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 138GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1H6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 119 118 120 122 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.8% Below average	Read 126 Write 120 Mixed 118 SusWrite 120 27% 121 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 27.3 4K Mixed 22.8 70% 22.5 MB/s	DQ Read 100 DQ Write 91.9 DQ Mixed 95.7 72% 96 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 111%
Seagate ST31000340AS 1TB-$136 7,908 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 431GB free Firmware: SD15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 73 73 73 74 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 111 Write 29.8 Mixed 57.7 SusWrite 72.8 50% 67.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 59%
Toshiba DT01ACA3 2TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2TB free Firmware: ABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 215 213 218 219 217 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 199 Write 223 Mixed 107 SusWrite 216 136% 186 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 0.7 193% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 119%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M392B1K73CM0-YF8 ID:80 CE M392B1K73CM0-YF8 ID:80 CE M392B1K73CM0-YF8 ID:80 CE M392B1K73CM0-YF8 ID:80 CE M392B1K73CM0-YF8 ID:80 CE M392B1K73CM0-YF8 ID:80 CE M392B1K73CM0-YF8 ID:80 CE M... 98GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.7% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 6.8 22% 7.63 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 6.1 18% 6.4 GB/s	Latency 85.8 47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
21%	16%	83	210	57	60	23"	1280 720	HWP3090 HP Z23i

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	188x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	179x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16