Acer ATC-105

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer ATC-105  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-105
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131226
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 24 '18 at 16:13
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)-$130
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 79.9
1-Core 73.4
2-Core 142
59% 98.3 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 222
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 235
Sapphire(174B D145) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
2.12% Terrible
Lighting 2.83
Reflection 2.88
Parallax 2.47
2% 2.73 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.97
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.12 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.12%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 159
Write 154
Mixed 151
116% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.34
95% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.9% Poor
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8.9
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback