Asus CM6870

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus CM6870 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CM6870
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 03 '16 at 10:39
Run Duration	382 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	79% Very good	Memory 93.8 1-Core 107 2-Core 206 79% 135 Pts	4-Core 347 8-Core 516 54% 431 Pts	64-Core 518 32% 518 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740 30,433 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Gigabyte(1458 368D) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6200 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	8.78% Terrible	Lighting 9.97 Reflection 8.65 Parallax 9.28 8% 9.3 fps	MRender 13.8 Gravity 9.53 Splatting 13.3 10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.78% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 532GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2376 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 684 (B1) Unknown 98 98 17 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 39 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 200 (F1) Unknown 99 99 37658423359
Poor: 78% Great: 126%
OCZ VERTEX-LE 200GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 128GB free Firmware: 1.37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 120 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 57707180599491 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1886 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 253 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 6656 (EA) Unknown 0 0 12288 (F1) Unknown 0 0 12288 (F2) Unknown 0 0 18304	38.3% Below average	Read 223 Write 121 Mixed 168 38% 171 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 45.5 4K Mixed 11 70% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 18 DQ Write 52.7 DQ Mixed 19.6 20% 30.1 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 44%
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 128GB 2,624 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 119GB free Firmware: HTRAN101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6644 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 721 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AD) Unknown 193 193 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 179 (C2) HDA temperature 71 56 188979347485 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	95% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 451 Mixed 499 109% 488 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 52.7 4K Mixed 35.4 103% 35.9 MB/s	DQ Read 354 DQ Write 284 DQ Mixed 17.4 95% 218 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 95% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 135137776 (03) Spinup time 96 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1172 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 73 60 22771385 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 6560 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 741 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 68 48 538968096 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 179 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 44 44 113438 (C2) HDA temperature 32 52 51539607584 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -20289425501477 (F1) Unknown 100 253 69215217987047 (F2) Unknown 100 253 -131121726665291	109% Outstanding	Read 187 Write 195 Mixed 144 131% 175 MB/s	4K Read 0.89 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.32 96% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 114%
ST950032 5AS 500GB 201 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 280GB free, PID 1057 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	26.9% Poor	Read 61.5 Write 63.7 Mixed 38.1 68% 54.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.29 4K Mixed 0.37 58% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 30%
Generic- SD/MMC 8GB 351 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 7GB free, PID 6362 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	3.46% Terrible	Read 12.6 Write 5.25 Mixed 2.74 7% 6.87 MB/s	4K Read 1.99 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.005 8% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.46% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SLA302G08-GGNNG Kingston 9905403-003.B00G 06C1 SLA302G08-GGNNG Kingston 9905403-003.B00G 16GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	58% Above average	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 17.5 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 19.2 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 60.4 66% 60.4 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CM6870 Builds (Compare 650 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6870

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	508x
Core i5-3450Intel $59Bench 66%, 34,199 samples	47x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	22x

GPU
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	59x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	37x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	34x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	19x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	17x

RAM
SLA302G08-GGNHC 4x4GBUnknownBench 56%, 881 samples	57x
EL64C1C1624Z1 4x4GBAdataBench 56%, 506 samples	47x
SLA302G08-GGNNG 4x4GBUnknownBench 56%, 364 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16